Scipione Borghese – Puppetmaster of Caravaggio

Caravaggio

Caravaggio, Ottavio Leoni, 1621

Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio (1571-1610) created a world of darkness and light through his paintings.  What may appear as just another expression of art to the casual viewer is in actuality a true reproduction of his world.  I have returned to the well of Caravaggio for another story from the artist’s short life, the influence of his patron, Cardinal Scipione Borghese (1577-1633).  Drawing from Andrew Graham-Dixon’s book, Caravaggio, A Life Sacred and Profane, and M, the Man who became Caravaggio by Peter Robb, a portrait of sorts has appeared, detailing the obsession of the Cardinal and his ruthless collecting of the artist’s works.  No accidents of fate can be attributed to their relationship, only a hot- headed painter and one of the many who manipulated him to their own rewards.

Scipione Borghese, Ottavio Leoni

Scipione Borghese, Ottavio Leoni, 1610

Scipione Borghese, the nephew of Pope John V, is someone fit to be called the Cardinal Nephew, willing to bend all opportunities to his desired machinations in the name of the papacy.  Scipione built three major private estates: Palazzo Pallavcini Rospigliosi, the Villa Borghese and Palazzo Borghese.  The Villa Borghese art collection is a testimony of Scipione’s drive to establish the Borghese legacy with other ancient Roman families such as Colonna and Orsini.  Tireless and ruthless in his quest for art, the Cardinal considered extortion and outright theft to be tools of acquisition to complete his gallery.

The meeting of these men occurred in the Antechamber of Quirinale Palace, where Borghese was the papal representative of judicial administration.  Caravaggio was caught up in the net of his own violent arrogance, having assaulted the notary Mariano Pasqualone, who brought charges against him.  A settlement was the required agreement, and for this consideration, Caravaggio showed his gratitude to the Cardinal with a gift, Saint Jerome Writing.  The deal was private enough that no record of a commission or payment survives, but the painting does appear in the possession of Scipione Borghese following this interesting event.

Saint Jerome Writing

Saint Jerome Writing, 1605

Camillo Borghese, Pope Paul V,

Camillo Borghese, Pope Paul V, 1552-1621, Caravaggio, 1605-6

Soon after, Caravaggio found himself the latest flavor in the Roman carnival of fame.  Commissions came his way from several sources, including a portrait of Pope John V, and a commission for the Basilica of Saint Peter; The Madonna and Child with St. Anne, 1605-06; for the altar of the Archconfraternity of the Papal Grooms.  The dream of his fellow artists to be enshrined in this cathedral with the greatest names of the day was within his grasp, for two days.

Madonna of the Grooms, Caravaggio

Madonna of the Grooms, 1605-6

“In this painting there are but vulgarity, sacrilege, impiousness and disgust… One would say it is a work made by a painter that can paint well, but of a dark spirit, and who has been for a lot of time far from God, from His adoration and from any good thought…” note from a Cardinal’s secretary of the time.

This was not the first of Caravaggio’s paintings considered unacceptable, but it was rejected by the College of Cardinals, from Saint Peter’s.  Displayed from April 14 thru April 16, the painting was removed and purchased at a remarkably reduced price by Scipione Borghese.  Recent archival research has revealed that the Cardinal was involved in obtaining the painting at a very early stage of the commission.  Borghese was stepping up his collection of the temperamental artist, by fair means or foul.

Death of the Virgin

Death of the Virgin, 1606

The Death of the Virgin, commissioned by Laerzio Alberti for his chapel in the Carmelite Chuch of Santa Maria della Scala, was ultimately rejected by the Carmelites.  The public reason is the portrayal of the Holy Mother is considered too secular, showing her bare legs.  Accused by his contemporaries of using a local prostitute in the portrayal of Mary, sacrilege for the time, the church deemed it unacceptable, giving another wound to Caravaggio’s pride.  The painting was immediately purchased by the Duke of Mantua, on the recommendation of Peter Paul Ruebens, who called it Caravaggio’s “best work.”

The next masterpieces came to the Borghese collection in 1607, through the settlement of a tax bill.   Giuseppe Cesari, former teacher of Caravaggio, found himself an impediment to Cardinal Borghese’s obsession.  Cesari had a considerable stock of paintings from various apprentices, with two by Caravaggio; Borghese made an insulting offer, which Cesari had the temerity to refuse.  That mistake saw him arrested on false charges with a possible death sentence hanging over him; the payment came in the form of 107 paintings.  The Pope gave them all to Scipione including Sick Bacchus, and Boy with a Basket of Fruit, advancing the Borghese family collection further.

Boy with a Basket of Fruit, 1593

Boy with a Basket of Fruit, 1593

Sick Bacchus

Sick Bacchus, self portrait, 1593

I leave the story of Caravaggio for the moment, as he struggles between the love and hate of Rome, his ego filled with righteous indignation and praise.  The events of his life are ready to collide with the murder of Ranuccio Tommassoni and the artist’s life on the run from papal justice.  Scipione Borghese is not finished with Caravaggio, becoming a crucial figure in his final days.

Has Caravaggio influenced your view of art?  Is his story typical of the tortured artist or are his actions compounded by the puppetmasters of the time?  I would love to chat with you about this artist!

If you want to learn more about the artist Caravaggio, there are similar facets to his story posted here:

Caravaggio, before Fame and Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio

Detail, Boy with a Basket of Fruit, 1593

Detail, Boy with a Basket of Fruit, 1593

Picture Links

Caravaggio, by Octavio Leoni

Scipione Borghese, by Octavio Leoni

Saint Jerome Writing, by Caravaggio

Pope Paul V, by Caravaggio

Madonna of the Grooms, by Caravaggio

Death of the Virgin, by Caravaggio

Boy with a Basket of Fruit, by Caravaggio

Sick Bacchus, by Caravaggio

Research Links

Andrew Graham-Dixon, Caravaggio, A Life Sacred and Profane

Peter Robb, M, the Man who Became Caravaggio

Leave a Comment

Filed under January

Cabinet of Curiosities

apothecary cabinet

This week’s Cabinet of Curiosity comes from the Rijksmuseum; Apothecary Cabinet from Delft, 1730.  The contents complete with a myriad of glass containers and pottery.  Obviously something highly prized considering the condition of all the accessories, some complete with their original contents.

delft containers

In 1543, a Rouen potter made a large number of drug pots for a local apothecary and decorated in the Italian style.  The art of enameling was introduced to The Netherlands in the 16th century by Italian potters who settled in Antwerp.  The Dutch town of Delft became famous for the manufacture of tin-glazed earthenware decorated in the blue and white imitation of Chinese porcelain, then being imported by the Dutch East India Company.

glass bottles skeleton painting

Interior painting detail

Remains of items in glass

Due to the overwhelming success of the Dutch potters, the general term Delftware eventually replaced the terms majolica and faience for the tin-glazed earthenware of Holland.  The most typical of Delft apothecary jars is the peacock motif consisting of two peacocks standing on either side of a basket of fruit with an angel’s head below.  Three examples can be seen on a stamp from Belgium.  The ewer is labeled MERCURIAL, for Oxymel of Mercury; the Delft pot with a metal cover is labeled GENTAINE, for Extract of Gentian; and the third pot is inscribed PHILO(N) ROM(ANUM), a name given to a widely used confection of opium.

Delft apothecary jars

Let us look inside the drawers and imagine some curiosities contained therein:

prayer nut

A prayer nut was an extravagant devotional object from the late Middle Ages; two silver plated pieces of carved wood with a diameter of 4.8cm joined together form the round nut.  The small ball was carried around by the wealthy on a silver chain.  The nut was not used exclusively for prayer, but also displayed as a status symbol and admired for the extremely detailed carvings found inside.  Turpenoids (aromatic fragrances) had been inserted within the delicate filigree.  These fragrances were intended to heighten the emotional experience for the person using the Prayer Nut.

Prayer nut close up

For the latest in technology to view this microcosm of art, Augmented Reality offers a new virtual tour.  By printing the barcode and holding it up to your webcam, you will be able to navigate the interior of the Rijksmuseum’s Prayer Nut, examining the carvings in minute detail.  Better than holding it in your hand!

ancient curse revealed

Another personal item small enough to fit in this cabinet would be the ancient curse tablet.  Currently on view at the Getty Villa, this tablet was thrown into a pit in the sanctuary of the Gods of the Underworld at Morgantina around 100 BC.  In total, 10 curse tables have been excavated from the pit.  Incredibly, four of these all curse the same woman!  Using almost exactly the same wording, the four call on the Gods of the Underworld to take a slave-girl named Venusta back with them to the realm of the dead – in other words, for her to go to hell.  The one on view at the Getty reads:

Gaia, Hermes, Gods of the Underworld, receive Venusta, slave of Rufus.

misery of idleness george morland before 1790

The final item in this week’s cabinet cannot be contained in any of these small spaces.  A huge undertaking by the Scottish National Galleries to digitize their entire collection into a searchable database is now complete.  Digital initiatives such as this are great exposure for the treasures a museum holds in their vast storage rooms.  One small setback to this leap into virtual tourism can be the difficulty in searching the database.  The Scottish National Gallery has solved this problem with a tab call “Hitlist.”  Navigating the top searches opens other tabs to etours, and related images.  My favorite discovery to date is George Morland’s “The Misery of Idleness”, 1790.

Morland’s work of the 1780s highlighted the moral shortcomings of domestic life, influenced by William Hogarth (1697-1764).  A notoriously heavy drinker and debtor, Morland spent the final years of his life enduring intermittent bouts in prison and eventually died of alcoholism at age 41.  His flamboyant lifestyle became the subject of four anecdotal biographies immediately after his death.

This concludes a full year of my Cabinet of Curiosities.  I really enjoy putting these together from the bits of research I find on the web, and they have taken on a life of their own through other readers.  Do you have any suggestions for the Cabinet?  I will be happy to chat with you about Curiosities!

Cheers to the New Year!

MJ

Leave a Comment

Filed under December